test(python): control stray-output fragments for sealing coverage

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.md
-2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.md: e6cd1ef37dce318920d75545f816006a98989076
-2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.zh.md: e60910aebdc2952a2bfb6ab25963a973ea41ac87
+2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.md: 5cf3b14503162d67d0fbb27743228cb1a8d7ffe2
+2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.zh.md: db82566c11b50b9203d30f7be6aec1378512f94b

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.md

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Terminal cases that drive a mocked PTY exit pin the containment they need (`inte
 
 Both illegal-UTF-8 residual cases in `packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/runtime.spec.ts` pace their writes with `time.sleep(0.001)`: `os.sched_yield()` lets a loaded reader coalesce the writes into one chunk, and the coalesced chunk is what the wrapped `Buffer.concat` measures (the hosted image measured 2563 against the 2048 bound with a correct implementation). Their payloads stay above that bound — 3200 bytes for the `0xFF` case and 1100 `ED A0 80` sequences, 3300 raw bytes, for the CESU-8 case, past the 3072-byte budget a raw-byte undercount reaches — so the undercount still flushes above 2048. Each carries a 20s case budget for the paced writes plus the interpreter start.
 
+The stray-output sealing test in `packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/stray-fragments.spec.ts` keeps a real Python child but splits its stdout reads into single-byte events. OS pipe coalescing cannot guarantee the 1024 fragments needed to seal a block: [run 34465259316](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/34465259316) passed all assertions but missed that branch. The controlled reads exercise repeated sealing and the final newline merge; exact output and bounded copy volume detect dropped bytes and repeated prefix copies.
+
 The Linux coverage lane grants `DSH_COVERAGE_TEST_TIMEOUT_MS: '90000'`, matching the Windows coverage lane, because the disposal cases in `subprocess-local` and `bash-sandbox` exceed the 5000ms default when the lane's partitions, workers, and sibling gates share one host.
 
 The Windows folder-dialog smoke probes `CoCreateInstance(CLSID_FileOpenDialog)` through PowerShell instead of gating on `process.platform`. An image that answers `CLASS_E_CLASSNOTAVAILABLE` (0x80040111) runs the clean-rejection case and skips the real-dialog case, so `win32-dialog.ts` keeps its file coverage without a host that can open a dialog. Every exception from that activation reads as refusal, so a host failing the probe for another reason only loses the real-dialog case; a probe that cannot run at all keeps the win32 assumption.

.agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-09-10-hosted-image-test-assumptions.zh.md

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Status: implemented
 
 `packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/runtime.spec.ts` 的两个非法 UTF-8 残余用例都用 `time.sleep(0.001)` 控制写入节奏：`os.sched_yield()` 会让被抢占的读端把多次写入合并成一个分块，而被包裹的 `Buffer.concat` 测量的正是该分块（在正确实现下，托管镜像测得 2563，超过了 2048 的界）。两个用例的载荷都保持在该界之上——`0xFF` 用例 3200 字节，CESU-8 用例 1100 个 `ED A0 80` 序列（3300 原始字节，超过按原始字节计费会触及的 3072 字节预算）——因此少计仍然会在 2048 之上触发 flush。两者各自带有 20s 的用例预算，容纳带节奏的写入与解释器启动。
 
+`packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/stray-fragments.spec.ts` 的原生输出分块封存测试保留真实 Python 子进程，但把 stdout 读取拆成单字节事件。操作系统的管道合并无法保证达到封存一块所需的 1024 个片段：[run 34465259316](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/34465259316) 的全部断言通过，却未覆盖该分支。可控读取覆盖反复封存和末尾换行合并；精确输出与复制总量上限检测字节丢失和前缀反复复制。
+
 Linux coverage 通道授予 `DSH_COVERAGE_TEST_TIMEOUT_MS: '90000'`，与 Windows coverage 通道一致，因为当该通道的分区、worker 与同级门禁共用一个宿主时，`subprocess-local` 与 `bash-sandbox` 的处置用例会超过 5000ms 默认值。
 
 Windows 文件夹对话框冒烟测试改为通过 PowerShell 探测 `CoCreateInstance(CLSID_FileOpenDialog)`，而不再按 `process.platform` 分流。回答 `CLASS_E_CLASSNOTAVAILABLE`（0x80040111）的镜像会跑干净的拒绝用例并跳过真实对话框用例，因此 `win32-dialog.ts` 在没有可开对话框的宿主上仍保有文件覆盖率。该激活过程抛出的任何异常都按拒绝解读，因此因其它原因探测失败的宿主只会失去真实对话框用例；完全无法运行的探测则保留 win32 假设。

packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/runtime.spec.ts

@@ -4759,58 +4759,6 @@ describe('PythonCodeRuntime — hostile peer', () => {
     expect(copied).toBeLessThan(256 * 1024)
   }, 40_000)
 
-  it('seals trickled stray fragments into blocks without recopying the sealed prefix', async () => {
-    // The stray-capture buffer has the same object-overhead exposure as the fd-3
-    // reader above: each newline-free `data` chunk is its own Buffer, so a
-    // program pacing single-byte `os.write(1, ...)` accumulates one object per
-    // write, which the serialized-cost counter cannot see. Past MAX_PENDING_CHUNKS
-    // the fragments seal into a finished block; re-merging the whole residual at
-    // each threshold instead would copy the sealed prefix again and again, making
-    // the cumulative copy volume quadratic. `Buffer.concat` is wrapped to measure
-    // that volume — both shapes admit the same final log entry, so the copy total
-    // is the discriminator. maxLogBytes is raised so the trickle is retained,
-    // not truncated, which is what forces the fragments to accumulate and seal.
-    const realConcat = Buffer.concat.bind(Buffer)
-    let copied = 0
-    Buffer.concat = (list: readonly Uint8Array[], total?: number): Buffer<ArrayBuffer> => {
-      for (const part of list) copied += part.length
-      return realConcat(list, total)
-    }
-    let result: CodeRunResult
-    try {
-      const { runtime } = await setup({ maxLogBytes: 200_000, maxWallMs: 30_000 })
-      result = await runtime.run({
-        program: [
-          'import os',
-          'for _ in range(60000):',
-          '    os.write(1, b"x")',
-          '    os.sched_yield()',
-          'os.write(1, b"\\n")',
-          'return "done"',
-        ].join('\n'),
-        bindings: [],
-      })
-    } finally {
-      Buffer.concat = realConcat
-    }
-    expect(result.error).toBeUndefined()
-    expect(result.value).toBe('done')
-    // The trickle coalesces into one log line (no interior newlines). Its exact
-    // length depends on pipe coalescing, but it is one entry and non-empty.
-    expect(result.logs.length).toBe(1)
-    expect((result.logs[0] as string).length).toBeGreaterThan(0)
-    // Sealing appends a finished block rather than re-merging everything held, so
-    // each byte is copied a bounded number of times. Re-merging the whole
-    // residual at every seal threshold instead makes the cumulative copy volume
-    // quadratic. Measured like the fd-3 sibling above rather than reasoned about:
-    // this sealed shape copies about 120 KB for 60000 trickled bytes, the
-    // re-merging shape about 538 KB (the stray path adds one whole-residual
-    // concat at the terminating newline over the fd-3 sibling's 119/540, landing
-    // at the same order). 256 KiB sits between them with margin on both sides, so
-    // reverting the seal to a re-merge turns this assertion red.
-    expect(copied).toBeLessThan(256 * 1024)
-  }, 40_000)
-
   it('caps a huge exception diagnostic child-side before it crosses the wire', async () => {
     // A program can raise with a multi-megabyte message; the child must cap
     // it at maxValueBytes before formatting/sending, not ship the whole

packages/experimental/code-runtime-python/tests/stray-fragments.spec.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+import { Context } from '@deepseek-ai/cordis'
+import { expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
+
+// Keep the interpreter and pipe lifecycle real; only OS-dependent read sizes
+// change. Each byte reaches the runtime as its own data event.
+vi.mock('node:child_process', async (importOriginal) => {
+  const actual = await importOriginal<typeof import('node:child_process')>()
+  return {
+    ...actual,
+    spawn: vi.fn(actual.spawn).mockImplementation((...args) => {
+      const child = actual.spawn(...args)
+      const stdout = child.stdout!
+      const emit = stdout.emit.bind(stdout)
+      stdout.emit = (event: string | symbol, ...values: unknown[]) => {
+        if (event !== 'data') return emit(event, ...values)
+        const chunk = values[0] as Buffer
+        for (let offset = 0; offset < chunk.length; offset++) {
+          emit('data', chunk.subarray(offset, offset + 1))
+        }
+        return true
+      }
+      return child
+    }),
+  }
+})
+
+const { PythonCodeRuntime } = await import('../src/index.ts')
+
+it('seals stray fragments without recopying the sealed prefix', async () => {
+  const ctx = new Context()
+  const fiber = await ctx.plugin(PythonCodeRuntime, { maxLogBytes: 200_000, maxWallMs: 30_000 })
+  const realConcat = Buffer.concat.bind(Buffer)
+  let copied = 0
+  let maxFragments = 0
+  const concat = vi.spyOn(Buffer, 'concat').mockImplementation((list, total) => {
+    maxFragments = Math.max(maxFragments, list.length)
+    for (const part of list) copied += part.length
+    return realConcat(list, total)
+  })
+  try {
+    const result = await ctx.codeRuntime.run({
+      program: 'import os\nos.write(1, b"x" * 60000 + b"\\n")\nreturn "done"',
+      bindings: [],
+    })
+    expect(result.error).toBeUndefined()
+    expect(result.value).toBe('done')
+    expect(result.logs).toEqual(['x'.repeat(60_000)])
+    // Sealing copies each byte at most twice; merging every accumulated prefix
+    // instead copies over a megabyte for these 60,001 controlled fragments.
+    expect(maxFragments).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1024)
+    expect(copied).toBeLessThan(256 * 1024)
+  } finally {
+    concat.mockRestore()
+    await fiber.dispose()
+  }
+}, 40_000)