docs(code-runtime-python): drop the dangling list-conjunction in the six-item note enumeration

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md
-2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md: c7347ec19cf2e6039f04bf8c3ec4b2162ee3f758
-2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md: 6f15cf9ca06ef2ea70685dd084e8034e377a2d4a
+2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md: 1a55169bc27f1add06689d4a5582fd6e843bc354
+2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md: d567ce58864479ee92388374f0ec6125614d7d71

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The CPython subprocess backend for Code Mode, built on the [fd-3 frame protocol](../architecture/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-fd3-protocol.md), resolves every program outcome as a `CodeRunResult`, rejects `run()` only for seam misuse, and disposes to quiescence so no subprocess that stays in the child's process group outlives the fiber (a descendant that escapes the group with `setsid()` is the documented exception — see the package README's Known Limitations). A sequence of review passes surfaced defects that broke those contracts in ways unit coverage did not catch — each hid behind a `/* v8 ignore */`, a captured-callable that read as a fix but was not, a memory effect invisible through the seam, a load-time bound that double-counted, a process-group escalation that a survivor could outlast, a cross-event-loop completion that silently deadlocked, a synchronous throw outside the settlement path, or a transport boundary rendered as a log boundary. Most behavioral fixes ship with a test that fails without them; six do not, and are called out as such — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement with no cross-platform-deterministic failure), the confirmed-empty finalize (its only seam-observable effect, a frozen heartbeat, freezes the instant SIGKILL is delivered, which the pre-fix finalize-on-delivery code also produced, and the discriminating probe is the signal-0 check the Alternatives reject as cross-environment-unreliable), the shared stdout/stderr budget (its only seam-observable difference is which entry boundary a mid-stream flush lands on, and that depends on the relative arrival timing of two independent OS pipes, which `os.sched_yield` does not make deterministic; the per-pipe memory bounds it strengthens ARE covered by the single-pipe flood tests), and the `flush_line` join-clear-push reorder (it lowers the settlement-flush peak from three copies to two, but the 12x load gate already covers the three-copy newline path, so every gate-admitted config stays within the address space under both orders and no seam-observable difference exists — the memory effect is inside the Python child, unmeasurable through the seam like the shared-budget case), pacing binding replies (its in-tree case only asserts the framed replies still round-trip; the peak it removes lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unseen through the seam, so the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB reduction is measurable only out-of-tree), and dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all also hold pre-fix, because `sendReply` already dropped after-settlement values — just later than the snapshot).
+The CPython subprocess backend for Code Mode, built on the [fd-3 frame protocol](../architecture/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-fd3-protocol.md), resolves every program outcome as a `CodeRunResult`, rejects `run()` only for seam misuse, and disposes to quiescence so no subprocess that stays in the child's process group outlives the fiber (a descendant that escapes the group with `setsid()` is the documented exception — see the package README's Known Limitations). A sequence of review passes surfaced defects that broke those contracts in ways unit coverage did not catch — each hid behind a `/* v8 ignore */`, a captured-callable that read as a fix but was not, a memory effect invisible through the seam, a load-time bound that double-counted, a process-group escalation that a survivor could outlast, a cross-event-loop completion that silently deadlocked, a synchronous throw outside the settlement path, or a transport boundary rendered as a log boundary. Most behavioral fixes ship with a test that fails without them; six do not, and are called out as such — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement with no cross-platform-deterministic failure), the confirmed-empty finalize (its only seam-observable effect, a frozen heartbeat, freezes the instant SIGKILL is delivered, which the pre-fix finalize-on-delivery code also produced, and the discriminating probe is the signal-0 check the Alternatives reject as cross-environment-unreliable), the shared stdout/stderr budget (its only seam-observable difference is which entry boundary a mid-stream flush lands on, and that depends on the relative arrival timing of two independent OS pipes, which `os.sched_yield` does not make deterministic; the per-pipe memory bounds it strengthens ARE covered by the single-pipe flood tests), the `flush_line` join-clear-push reorder (it lowers the settlement-flush peak from three copies to two, but the 12x load gate already covers the three-copy newline path, so every gate-admitted config stays within the address space under both orders and no seam-observable difference exists — the memory effect is inside the Python child, unmeasurable through the seam like the shared-budget case), pacing binding replies (its in-tree case only asserts the framed replies still round-trip; the peak it removes lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unseen through the seam, so the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB reduction is measurable only out-of-tree), and dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all also hold pre-fix, because `sendReply` already dropped after-settlement values — just later than the snapshot).
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -110,4 +110,4 @@ One residual write-path copy is fixed alongside, independent of the config gate:
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The seam's resolve-don't-reject contract holds on the boot-write path and the synchronous-spawn-failure path, both with measured coverage, and neither strands a staging directory. Log capture is thread-safe at the cost of one re-entrant lock acquisition per write and flush, and stray native output is delimited by its own newlines rather than by transport chunks. Fd-3 residual memory is bounded by the actual retained bytes, and both frame readers scan an accumulating frame once rather than quadratically. The output caps admit every value a frame can carry and reject a non-integer budget at load. Disposal is genuinely quiescent against a same-group survivor — bounded by `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS`, zero-cost when the group is already empty, with the SIGKILL timer cleared once the group empties so a stale kill cannot strike a recycled pgid — RLIMIT enforcement keeps the strictest of configured and inherited on both soft and hard (and the SIGXCPU diagnostic no longer names a budget the host cannot guarantee), bindings called from model-created threads complete instead of timing out, and the handshake frame reader no longer burns the CPU budget on a large program. Every behavioral fix carries a test that fails without it, except the six called out in the Problem section — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement), the confirmed-empty finalize (whose only seam-observable effect freezes at signal delivery, which the pre-fix code also produced), the shared stdout/stderr budget (whose only seam-observable difference turns on nondeterministic cross-pipe arrival timing), and the `flush_line` reorder (whose lowered peak stays within what the 12x gate already admits, so no config behaves differently), pacing binding replies (the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB peak reduction lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unmeasurable through the seam), and dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all hold pre-fix, so it is not a fail-before case) — so a future regression on the rest goes red.
+The seam's resolve-don't-reject contract holds on the boot-write path and the synchronous-spawn-failure path, both with measured coverage, and neither strands a staging directory. Log capture is thread-safe at the cost of one re-entrant lock acquisition per write and flush, and stray native output is delimited by its own newlines rather than by transport chunks. Fd-3 residual memory is bounded by the actual retained bytes, and both frame readers scan an accumulating frame once rather than quadratically. The output caps admit every value a frame can carry and reject a non-integer budget at load. Disposal is genuinely quiescent against a same-group survivor — bounded by `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS`, zero-cost when the group is already empty, with the SIGKILL timer cleared once the group empties so a stale kill cannot strike a recycled pgid — RLIMIT enforcement keeps the strictest of configured and inherited on both soft and hard (and the SIGXCPU diagnostic no longer names a budget the host cannot guarantee), bindings called from model-created threads complete instead of timing out, and the handshake frame reader no longer burns the CPU budget on a large program. Every behavioral fix carries a test that fails without it, except the six called out in the Problem section — the chunked frame read (a syscall-count improvement), the confirmed-empty finalize (whose only seam-observable effect freezes at signal delivery, which the pre-fix code also produced), the shared stdout/stderr budget (whose only seam-observable difference turns on nondeterministic cross-pipe arrival timing), the `flush_line` reorder (whose lowered peak stays within what the 12x gate already admits, so no config behaves differently), pacing binding replies (the 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB peak reduction lives inside the host's fd-3 writable buffer, unmeasurable through the seam), and dropping a late binding resolution before snapshot (its three assertions all hold pre-fix, so it is not a fail-before case) — so a future regression on the rest goes red.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-settlement-fixes.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
-用于 Code Mode 的 CPython 子进程后端建立在 [fd-3 帧协议](../architecture/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-fd3-protocol.md)之上，把每个程序结果都 resolve 成一个 `CodeRunResult`，仅在 seam 被误用时才 reject `run()`，并且会 dispose 到完全停稳，从而没有任何留在子进程自己进程组内的子进程存活得比 fiber 更久（一个用 `setsid()` 逃出该进程组的后代是有文档记载的例外——见该包 README 的 Known Limitations）。一连串审查暴露出一些缺陷，它们以单元测试覆盖率无法捕获的方式破坏了这些契约：每一个都藏在一处 `/* v8 ignore */` 之后、一个读起来像修复但实际并非修复的捕获可调用对象之后、一处透过 seam 不可见的内存效应之后、一处重复计数的加载期上界之后、一处存活者能够熬过的进程组升级之后、一处静默死锁的跨事件循环完成之后、一处位于结算路径之外的同步抛出之后，或者一处被当作日志边界处理的传输边界之后。大多数行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试；有六处没有，并被如此标注——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进，没有可跨平台确定性断言的失败）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应，即一个冻结的心跳，会在 SIGKILL 被投递的瞬间冻结，而修复前"投递即收尾"的代码也会产生同样的结果，用于区分的探测手段是 Alternatives 以跨环境不可靠为由否决的 signal-0 检查）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异，是一次流中冲刷落在哪条条目边界上，而这取决于两条相互独立的 OS 管道的相对到达时机，`os.sched_yield` 并不能使其确定；它所强化的按管道计的内存界限确实由单管道洪泛测试覆盖），以及 `flush_line` 的 join-清空-push 重排序（它把结算期冲刷的峰值从三份副本降到两份，但 12× 加载门本就覆盖了换行路径的三副本峰值，因此每个被门放行的配置在两种顺序下都落在地址空间之内、不存在透过 seam 可观测的差异——该内存效应在 Python 子进程内部，与共享预算那处一样无法透过 seam 度量），节流 binding 回复（它的树内用例只断言分帧后的回复仍能完整往返；它所移除的峰值位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可见，因此 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的降幅只能在树外度量），以及在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因为 `sendReply` 本就丢弃结算之后的值——只是比快照晚）。
+用于 Code Mode 的 CPython 子进程后端建立在 [fd-3 帧协议](../architecture/2026-07-31-code-runtime-python-fd3-protocol.md)之上，把每个程序结果都 resolve 成一个 `CodeRunResult`，仅在 seam 被误用时才 reject `run()`，并且会 dispose 到完全停稳，从而没有任何留在子进程自己进程组内的子进程存活得比 fiber 更久（一个用 `setsid()` 逃出该进程组的后代是有文档记载的例外——见该包 README 的 Known Limitations）。一连串审查暴露出一些缺陷，它们以单元测试覆盖率无法捕获的方式破坏了这些契约：每一个都藏在一处 `/* v8 ignore */` 之后、一个读起来像修复但实际并非修复的捕获可调用对象之后、一处透过 seam 不可见的内存效应之后、一处重复计数的加载期上界之后、一处存活者能够熬过的进程组升级之后、一处静默死锁的跨事件循环完成之后、一处位于结算路径之外的同步抛出之后，或者一处被当作日志边界处理的传输边界之后。大多数行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试；有六处没有，并被如此标注——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进，没有可跨平台确定性断言的失败）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应，即一个冻结的心跳，会在 SIGKILL 被投递的瞬间冻结，而修复前"投递即收尾"的代码也会产生同样的结果，用于区分的探测手段是 Alternatives 以跨环境不可靠为由否决的 signal-0 检查）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异，是一次流中冲刷落在哪条条目边界上，而这取决于两条相互独立的 OS 管道的相对到达时机，`os.sched_yield` 并不能使其确定；它所强化的按管道计的内存界限确实由单管道洪泛测试覆盖），`flush_line` 的 join-清空-push 重排序（它把结算期冲刷的峰值从三份副本降到两份，但 12× 加载门本就覆盖了换行路径的三副本峰值，因此每个被门放行的配置在两种顺序下都落在地址空间之内、不存在透过 seam 可观测的差异——该内存效应在 Python 子进程内部，与共享预算那处一样无法透过 seam 度量），节流 binding 回复（它的树内用例只断言分帧后的回复仍能完整往返；它所移除的峰值位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可见，因此 32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的降幅只能在树外度量），以及在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因为 `sendReply` 本就丢弃结算之后的值——只是比快照晚）。
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -110,4 +110,4 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Consequences
 
-seam 的"只 resolve、不 reject"契约在引导写入路径和同步 spawn 失败路径上都得以成立，两者的覆盖率都是被度量的，且两者都不会遗留一个暂存目录。日志捕获是线程安全的，代价是每次写入和 flush 都要获取一次可重入锁，并且散逸的原生输出由它自己的换行符来分隔，而不是由传输分片来分隔。fd-3 残余数据的内存受实际保留的字节数约束，并且两个帧读取器都以一次而非平方级的方式扫描一个不断累积的帧。输出上限放行一个帧所能承载的每一个值，并在加载期拒绝一个非整数的预算。dispose 面对同进程组存活者是真正完全停稳的（以 `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS` 为界，在进程组已为空时代价为零，并且一旦进程组清空就清除 SIGKILL 定时器，从而一次滞留的 kill 无法击中一个被回收的 pgid），RLIMIT 强制在 soft 和 hard 两者上都保持配置值与继承值中的最严格者（并且 SIGXCPU 诊断不再把一个宿主无法保证的预算说出来），并且从模型创建的线程调用的绑定会完成而不是超时，而且握手帧读取器不再在一个大程序上烧掉 CPU 预算。每处行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试，除了 Problem 一节点出的那六处——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应会在信号投递时冻结，而修复前的代码也会产生同样的结果）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异取决于不确定的跨管道到达时机），以及 `flush_line` 重排序（它降低后的峰值仍落在 12× 门本就放行的范围内，因此没有配置会有不同表现）、节流 binding 回复（32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的峰值降幅位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可度量），以及在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因此不是一处缺代码即变红的用例）——因此其余各处未来若发生回归都会变红。
+seam 的"只 resolve、不 reject"契约在引导写入路径和同步 spawn 失败路径上都得以成立，两者的覆盖率都是被度量的，且两者都不会遗留一个暂存目录。日志捕获是线程安全的，代价是每次写入和 flush 都要获取一次可重入锁，并且散逸的原生输出由它自己的换行符来分隔，而不是由传输分片来分隔。fd-3 残余数据的内存受实际保留的字节数约束，并且两个帧读取器都以一次而非平方级的方式扫描一个不断累积的帧。输出上限放行一个帧所能承载的每一个值，并在加载期拒绝一个非整数的预算。dispose 面对同进程组存活者是真正完全停稳的（以 `graceMs + 2 * CLOSE_REAP_MARGIN_MS` 为界，在进程组已为空时代价为零，并且一旦进程组清空就清除 SIGKILL 定时器，从而一次滞留的 kill 无法击中一个被回收的 pgid），RLIMIT 强制在 soft 和 hard 两者上都保持配置值与继承值中的最严格者（并且 SIGXCPU 诊断不再把一个宿主无法保证的预算说出来），并且从模型创建的线程调用的绑定会完成而不是超时，而且握手帧读取器不再在一个大程序上烧掉 CPU 预算。每处行为修复都附带一个在缺少它时会失败的测试，除了 Problem 一节点出的那六处——分块读取帧（一处系统调用次数的改进）、确认为空后的收尾（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的效应会在信号投递时冻结，而修复前的代码也会产生同样的结果）、共享的 stdout／stderr 预算（它唯一透过 seam 可观测的差异取决于不确定的跨管道到达时机），`flush_line` 重排序（它降低后的峰值仍落在 12× 门本就放行的范围内，因此没有配置会有不同表现）、节流 binding 回复（32.0 MiB → 0.0 MiB 的峰值降幅位于宿主 fd-3 可写缓冲内部、透过 seam 不可度量），以及在快照之前丢弃迟到的 binding 解析（它的三条断言在修复前同样成立，因此不是一处缺代码即变红的用例）——因此其余各处未来若发生回归都会变红。