Review noted the handler's comment said "EPIPE" while the code swallowed every
stdin 'error'. Swallowing any stdin-write error IS correct here — the write is
best-effort and the command's authoritative outcome is its exit code + captured
output (reported by the `close` handler regardless of whether the write landed).
A rare non-EPIPE pipe fault means the command ran with incomplete stdin, which
it surfaces itself via its own exit/output; rejecting `done` would instead
discard that real output and turn it into an opaque infrastructure error. Widen
the comment to state this rather than implying only EPIPE is caught. No behavior
change.
Tianyi Cui
7097e4fb50